чување b87114bd6e5f1874da1d7209e582b7022f4e81d4
родитељ 2d4c598721850cd3e21294556d6cc5945254ec80
Аутор: Страхиња Радић <contact@strahinja.org>
Датум: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:43:00 +0200
Updated README
Signed-off-by: Страхиња Радић <contact@strahinja.org>
Diffstat:
измењених датотека: 1, додавања: 11(+), брисања: 3(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
@@ -6,9 +6,6 @@ A: - There should be no need for GNOME to edit .po files.
- Some folks prefer terminal to GUI.
- No, plugin for vi(m) isn't enough.
-Q: This doesn't do X!
-A: See TODO for a list of implemented and planned features.
-
Q: Why C?
A: Because <Go/Rust/whatever soydev language of the moment> sucks.
@@ -16,6 +13,17 @@ Q: Why is poe saying there are <N+1> messages in my file when
other editors say there are <N> messages?
A: Because poe counts (and allows editing of) the first, special msgid.
+Q: This doesn't do X!
+A: See TODO for a list of implemented and planned features. I might consider
+ adding a feature if I have time, but already poe has all the major features I
+ planned. It is meant to be a simple .po editing program.
+
+Q: Is this suckless?
+A: Definitely not. Any TUI is not suckless. gettext is not suckless, and thus
+ .po files are also not suckless. Despite that, some suggestions for a
+ suckless approach to editing .po files: vi, ed. termbox is less bloated than
+ ncurses, though.
+
License
-------
